Just what is a
smart city?
Jessica Grasso
Earlier this morning, an article was published to shed
light on the emerging idea of “smart cities”. According to Jack Gold of J. Gold Associates, smart cities
will help “better manage power, reduce pollution
footprints, increase public safety, or offer improved services to residents”.
The counterarguments to the initiative are the cost of infrastructure and the
invasion of privacy this model might impose on citizens.
Some examples of how technology will be utilized are street
sensors to manage streetlights and traffic signals in the hopes of lowering
energy costs and usage. Sensors will
also be used to monitor water mains for leaks to reduce repair costs, or used to
monitor pollution levels. Police can also use video sensors to manage crowds or
spot crimes. One of the most interesting uses of sensors was in Bristol, England where a sensor system added to street
lamps, recorded the shadows of pedestrians walking by. The shadows were then
projected back through the streetlights for others walking by later to see as a
form of art.
In accordance with Moore’s Law, Carl
Piva, vice president at TF Forum, believes“ technology of the future will become more and more invisible to
individuals, and…people will not even notice the technology. For the time being,
that means seeing a lot of technology trying to talk to us or engage with us in
various ways.” While I agree with her ideas regarding the future nature of
technology, the long-run cost efficiency and that with more sophisticated
technology, innovative individuals will be attracted to “Smart cities”; I have
some concerns. I believe that the excessive sensors all over the city will
threaten and invade citizen’s privacy. Piva explains, "If you jump on a
bus (in China), you may encounter facial recognition, used to determine whether
you have a bus permit". This concept is worrisome to me for security and
privacy reasons. It seems like an interesting idea, but also one that can make
citizens feel unsafe and exposed. Essentially citizens are forfeiting their identity
to a government database that if hacked, could result in serious identity
theft.
Another example of how technology plays a role in Smart
Cities, Singapore has implemented interactive kiosks in airport bathrooms that
allow users to rate the cleanliness of the bathroom. While I understand that
the kiosk will help the airport increase performance, I find the idea
to be extremely invasive. Lastly, I am concerned that the more technology
expands and is used to help service cities; low skilled workers will become
less and less necessary. Smart cities will take work away from city workers and
force them to find a more high-skilled occupation because smart cities attract
smart people.
Interactive technology, reducing pollution
footprints, real-time decision-making and encouraging people to take high
skilled jobs are some of the benefits of Smart Cities. In my opinion, while the
benefits are great, some of the ideas will be too invasive and radical unless
the government assures people that their private information will be kept
private.
http://kcmo.gov/smartcity/
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.