Over the
past week, Apple has faced pressure from the FBI to provide a system update
that would allow them to unlock the Iphone of one of the San
Bernardino shooting suspects. Apple has cooperated with authorities throughout
the investigation, however they are strongly opposing pressure to create an update that would allow authorities to gain access to the device.
Apple
is gaining a large amount of support from consumers and other tech companies
due to the fact they are setting a precedent for protecting their costumers
privacy. Although they have admitted to having the required code needed to
unlock the phone, Apple fears that providing the government with this ability
will compromise the privacy of all other Apple users. Hackers could very easily
gain access to the code, threatening thousands of Iphone users private
information. I believe that this is a strong reason for why Apple should not
provide the code to the FBI because private information would then be available
to anyone with the knowledge and ability to hack the systems. In recent years,
Apple has been very willing to work with government officials, especially when
it comes to retrieving information from users ICloud accounts. According to
Apple, it’s users know that these files are made available to the company, with
Apple holding the key to the encrypted files in case they need to be retrieved
for any reason. I think this is an important aspect to keep in mind when
understanding the current issue between the FBI because users files and
information that they have synced with the cloud are available to authorities
if granted legal access, however the information provided by the San
Bernardino’s ICloud account leaves many questions, which is why the FBI
continues to pressure Apple to help them hack the phone. The final point that I
find very important is that is Apple does provide the code necessary to crack
the phone, governments throughout the world that continue monitor and control
free speech and threaten their citizens will use this update to control their
citizens even more. Ultimately I stand with Apples decision to protect their
costumer’s privacy and stand against government infringement on personal
property.
Although
I do personally agree with Apples decision to refrain from cracking the phone,
it is easy to understand the opposing argument. This article mentions that the
information stored on the phone is unknown, and I believe this fact is the one
supporting piece of evidence that the FBI should argue. In the modern day,
terrorism organizations use technology for all aspects of their crimes, and the
FBI could gain valuable information from the phone. I believe there are ways in
which Apple could provide officials with a code to crack the phone, and
subsequently provide Iphone users with a software update to protect it from
being hacked. Despite the outcome of this case, I believe it is important for
Apple to do all things possible to protect the privacy of its users.
Source
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-apple-attorney-fbi-order-could-destroy-the-iphone-as-it-exists-20160221-story.html
Outside Source
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/22/technology/apple-still-holds-the-keys-to-its-cloud-service-but-reluctantly.html?_r=0
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.