The
dispute between Apple and the U.S, government over the access to the iPhone of
one the San Bernardino gunman is a divisive one.
Basically, the dispute is over who should have more control over who has
access to private information, the government, or the company who makes the
products this information is stored in?
Apple believes that by allowing the government access directly to
encrypted data in the phone, not just the backups available in their cloud
technology, it would lead to a slippery slope.
IPhones are sold in countries like Pakistan, where homosexual acts are
punishable by death, and in Saudi Arabia, where adultery is illegal. Total government control could lead to social
justice violations, as well as a continued lack of privacy, which has plagued
tech companies for the past several years.
Every month, companies like Microsoft, Facebook, and Google publish
transparency reports in which companies turned over data from users because of
a court order. Apple has done this too,
most of the time, saying that they would provide data whenever they were
“technically able”. Not only has Apple
switched off its ability to retrieve data from its products in an update in
2014, but compromising it’s users data would discredit their business
model. Apple is also working on
strengthening its encryption of iCloud, similar to it’s phone encryption, that
would make it difficult for even them to get the data. What the government is asking is not for a
key to Apple’s encryptions, but rather a “weaker lock”. Again, this can set a very dangerous
precedent, where any data can be freely accessed by Government agencies.
A lot
of people may think that since Syed Rizwan Farook, the shooter in question, was
a criminal, that he forfeits rights to any privacy. While this article isn’t a defense of a
criminal, its trying to shed light on what could happen as a result of Apple
backing down. Agencies like the N.S.A.
have abused their power several times already, like the 2013 incident revealed
by Edward Snowden that showed that the agency hacked into fiber optic lines
that connected Yahoo and Google to data servers outside the U.S., even though
the N.S.A. already had access to the information on them. As a result, Google and Yahoo beefed up their
encryption. The N.S.A. has already showed
that it would abuse its power to invade privacy if given the chance.
It also
brings into question how up to date our laws are on privacy. In this case, to compel Apple to submit to
the warrant, a judge used the All Write act of 1789, a law passed before
electricity. We need to have a serious
talk about the legality of privacy and infringements on it in all cases, not
just when dealing with criminals. This
will be a hot topic issue in the next election, as Donald Trump has already
protested Apple products as a result.
Article http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/21/opinion/sunday/in-the-government-vs-apple-who-wears-the-black-hat.html?ref=technology
References http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/22/technology/apple-still-holds-the-keys-to-its-cloud-service-but-reluctantly.html?ref=technology&_r=0
http://fortune.com/2016/02/21/donald-trump-jeb-bush-apple-republican-primary/
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.