Microsoft’s
Research and Development team has been toying around with the ground breaking idea
of underwater datacenters in order to revolutionize the already very popular
cloud sharing technology. The prototype for this idea contained an operational
datacenter rack and was surrounded by pressurized nitrogen in order to help
soak up the heat that was generated by the rack. It was located approximately one
kilometer offshore in the Pacific Ocean from August to November 2015 before
Microsoft recovered it to study it further.
I agree with Microsoft’s belief that
this technology makes sense. As stated in the article, Microsoft would be able
to avoid the expensive costs of developing in a metro area, and they would also
avoid the added price of implanting fiber connectivity cables into these highly
trafficked areas. Plus, with the majority of the world living within close proximity
to oceans, these datacenters could be located offshore all over the world and
would cut down on data transfer times. On paper, it seems like a fantastic idea
but upon closer look, a few issues certainly arise.
The article confesses to not know
about many of the drawbacks it may experience with these underwater
datacenters. The creators of the prototype admit to having no idea of how it
will affect marine life. The engineers are uncertain how much thermal pollution
the datacenters will give off and how that could affect the fragile ecosystems
of surrounding marine life. In today’s day, that could pose for a huge
stumbling block when Microsoft attempts to implement these datacenters in a
large scale because environmentalists would certainly have a few things to say
about it. Another potential oversight is how secure these datacenters actually
are. The article says nothing about any type of security that would be
surrounding them, which leads me to believe that they are just plopped somewhere
off the shore in which case their depth wouldn’t be an unsurmountable feat.
Plus, Microsoft workers would have to be able to access them anyways for
repairs and maintenance, so they would certainly be within range of a human who
is interested in breaking into the datacenter and potentially hijacking the data
transfers that occur. Microsoft does have monitors on the centers to make sure
they are running properly, but would they have an emergency response
notification and how soon would workers be able to get there? Lastly, with
today’s complicated international laws, where would these datacenters fall into
play? If they are offshore of Europe in the Atlantic Ocean, would they follow
Europe’s intellectual property laws on the United States’?
I like the idea of these underwater
datacenters because I think they can establish a whole new playing field for
the technology industry, but there are certainly still a number of kinks that
need to be worked out before this project can get off the ground.
Donnelly, Caroline. "Microsoft’s Underwater
Datacentre: The Pros and Cons of Running Subsea Facilities." ComputerWeekly.
TechTarget, Feb. 2016. Web. 09 Feb. 2016.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.