Many concerns about new technology, including Cloud storage
systems, GPS tracking, credit card purchases, and the like, have to do with the
security implications. The security of one’s private information is at stake if
the technology cannot protect the user from theft. In some cases, security has
been almost guaranteed, including the new chip system on some credit cards,
which gives a unique number to each purchase, almost eliminating credit card
theft. On the other hand, as outlined in the article, “In South Korea, a
child-monitoring app is raising security concerns. Why?”, by CSMonitor.com,
there are instances where privacy has not been guaranteed, as is the case with
the various required child-monitoring apps in South Korea, including the app
Smart Sheriff.
Smart
Sheriff and other apps are available where parents can limit the child to what
websites he or she visits, track which websites the child went onto, track the
child to see where he or she is at any time, and even get alerts when a message
to or from the child includes key phrases such as “bully.” The South Korean
government is now requiring that these child-monitoring apps be pre-installed
onto the new phones of all users 18 and under.
There
are a couple problems with these required apps. The major one is that there is
a lack of information security. Smart Sheriff in particular was never properly
encoded, which means, according to the article, that a third party would be
able to access this information. The company cannot guarantee the safety of the
parent’s or child’s phone numbers, emails, text messages, or web browsing
history. Secondly, the article describes that the information travels from the
child’s phone, to the app developer, then to the mobile phone company, before
reaching the parent. This elongated transfer of information allows for multiple
areas where the information can potentially be hacked into, considering the lack
of security in the first place. Another prominent problem is that these apps
could potentially infringe on people’s privacy rights. Open Net Korea, an
internet policy activist group, stated, “The Decree is unconstitutional as it
infringes on children’s privacy and parental rights, increases the risk of data
breach, and overburdens both the business and the parents.”
One
side of the argument states that these apps are useful parenting tools in order
to make sure their children are safe from bullies and/or stay out of trouble.
These parents see these apps as a security blanket, so that they can know their
kids are safe. However, these apps are potentially putting these families at
more risk than the security that the app could potentially provide. There is a
point where children need to be by themselves, learning for themselves, and not
being one hundred percent hovered over by their parent or guardian. Along with
that, it is definitely not worth the price of one’s private information in
order to parent one’s children. This is an instance where technology has gone a
little too far.
http://www.csmonitor.com/Technology/2015/0921/In-South-Korea-a-child-monitoring-app-is-raising-security-concerns.-Why
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.